How Likely are Nurse Practitioners to Get Sued?

NP’s, PA’s and MD’s alike worry about medical malpractice lawsuits.  Despite hard work and good intentions, medical providers make mistakes.  Protocols and technology promise to make patients safer and reduce error but no system is foolproof.  Just how likely are you as a nurse practitioner to face a medical malpractice lawsuit?  How can you reduce your risk?

How Likely are Nurse Practitioners to be Sued?

In 2009, researchers looked back at data from 1991 to 2007 examining the number of medical malpractice claims among various types of medical providers.  The study showed that advanced practice providers, NP’s and PA’s, have decreased liability compared to physicians.  Researchers report “During that period, there was 1 payment for every 2.7 active physicians, 1 for every 32.5 active PA’s and 1 for every 65.8 active and inactive advanced practice nurses.  In percentage terms, 37% of physicians, 3.1% of physician assistants and 1.5% of advanced practice nurses would have made a malpractice payment.”

This study is great news for NP’s.  It indicates that by hiring nurse practitioners and physician assistants, physicians and hospitals do not increase their liability, a genuine concern among employers.

Why Are Nurse Practitioners Less Likely to be Sued than Physicians?

Are You Ready to Thrive?

Learn more about our online residency program; we pair clinical and professional development to take advanced practice providers to the next level. Get More Info>>

Experts believe that advanced practice providers are less likely to be sued than physicians because they spend more time with their patients.  Patients are less likely to file a malpractice claim when they have a relationship with or a positive interaction with their medical provider.  NP’s and PA’s are also more likely to take the time to answer their patient’s questions.

How Can You Reduce Your Risk of a Malpractice Lawsuit?

Nurse practitioners and physician assistants are most often sued when they act beyond their defined scope of practice or when they are inadequately supervised by physician.  It is imperative that you as a nurse practitioner know you state laws.  Be familiar with your legal scope of practice and practice only within these boundaries.  Familiarize yourself also with the protocols and regulations within your hospital so you do not overstep these practice guidelines.

If you have a question about a patient or are uncomfortable treating a patient yourself, ask for help from your supervising physician.  Even if you do not practice in a setting where collaboration is encouraged, I can assure you that neither you nor your employer wants to face a lawsuit because you were to afraid to seek help.  Communication with both your patients and your coworkers is key to avoiding a malpractice claim and delivering safe patient care.

Do you have any tips for avoiding legal complications as a nurse practitioner? 

You Might Also Like: New Additions to HIPAA Law- What NP’s Need to Know, Should Providers Treat Their Friends and Family?

12 thoughts on “How Likely are Nurse Practitioners to Get Sued?”

  1. this article is misleading. how can you include active AND also inactive NP’s against active PA’s and active MD’s? that’s like comparing accident rates between people who are actively driving a truck who had a CDL and those who have a CDL and do nothing with it. maybe I am wrong but I thought Advance Practice Nurses such as midwives and Nurse Anethetists were lumped into NP since those are all higher education with direct patient care. Maybe we should exclude Anaesthesiologists from the MD numbers then…

  2. Perhaps, the NP’s and PA’s got sued less because the MD responsible for them got sued and may even have made a malpractice payment.

  3. This is a very conflicting situation. There must be laws of course to help the patients and save the rights of the patients. But should that law punish people who serve to save others? My suggestion is that, there should be also laws to save nurses from potentially bad situations.

  4. First off, the main reason Midlevels get sued less is Physicians see sicker patients. Another reason: the high risk medical specialties (OBGYN, Neurosurgery, Trauma Surgery) do not have any Midlevels doing the procedures, and those are the most often sued specialties. So really, NPs get sued less because they work in lower risk areas. In addition, you included inactive NPs in the calculation. It’s darn hard to get sued for malpractice if you aren’t seeing patients. Worthless rhetoric of an article.

  5. NPs are mid levels, they do not have the education nor the knowledge of MDs and thus NPs are insufficiently capable of being anything other than a mid level. NPs do not know the pathophysiology of disease like MDs do, so why are there so many NPs trying to play doctor? If you want to be a doctor, go to medical school. Don’t get angry when you don’t have the authority of a doctor. You are not a MD.

  6. this article is very misleading. The writer obviously has never taken an actual stats class, otherwise they would understand the fallacy in this.
    NPs see much less ill patients, and tend to work in lower risk specialities. Why include inactive NPs?

    Is this a tout to try to give NPs a better name? Really? presenting false information does not help them out at all.

    Go back to school and learn maths please.

  7. The article makes a baseless assumption that midlevels have lower rates of malpractice payments because of “better relationships” without even entertains the more likely possibilities:

    1. Physicians work in more high risk specialties, (OB/GYN, surgery, anesthesia…etc.). There was no attempt to make an apples to apples comparison of primary care physicians to NPs and PAs

    2. Most importantly, the physician is more likely to be the sole defendant in a malpractice case involving a PA or NP. This is an important point to consider since PAs and NPs are always breathlessly lobbying for more authority. At some point, there will be an unavoidable dose of responsibility and many of the same people lobbying for more autonomy will find themselves seeking the familiar refuge of someone else’s license.

  8. To the person who wants to downplay what it takes to be an NP… You are clearly not in the medical field and you have no idea how difficult it is to be a Nurse Practitioner. To say that we have little background in pathophysiology is laughable. Yes Doctors go through 8 years of schooling. Nurse practitioners go through 6. Trust me as a working Nurse Practitioner we are reminded on a daily basis that we are not doctors. Yet we are required to take on the same patients. I have taken multiple classes on Pathophysiology so before you open your mouth take a second and think about who your talking to. If you are a doctor then shame on you. However, I can tell that your not, because a true and caring doctor who is good at what they do and appreciates nurses because they know that we are the heart and hands of the hospitals. Guess what NP’s are? Smart enough to diagnose and prescribe and on top of that compassionate.. Which is something you are clearly not.

  9. NPs with the help of attorneys and lobbyists have tried to produce false studies as such year after year.Fact remains they don’t have the education hours, sorry. No matter how many false studies you produce and how many senators you buy, you can’t buy residency and pain that doctors went through. It is easy to say 35% vs 1% lawsuit but reality is NPs drop the ball on high risk procedures, so who has to take chance?Real doctors. Also media and companies who hire them are hard at work to cover up their mess. And I feel many of their wrong doings on purpose gets covered up. States need to reverse their autonomy and put them where they are belonged. Under supervision.

  10. Probably depends on the acuity vs general maintenance. When the doctor gets sued, the NP will get sucked into it because they are supposed to be overseeing their patients and question matters. A hospital setting will more likely get into trouble vs. ordinary clinic. A nurse anesthesiologist and pediatric NPs have the highest liability. I agree nurse anesthesiologist and pediatric NPs should be put in their own categories.

  11. If the doctor is going to get sued, so will the NP; that is if they had any contact with the patient. NPs are supposed to catch and question/correct any errors the doctor made

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Post:

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Are you ready to Thrive?

Support + education for early career nurse practitioners.

Are you struggling as an early career NP or PA?

Learn more about ThriveAP, the program designed to boost primary care clinical knowledge.

Support and education for early career NPs & PAs

Download the ThriveAP info
packet for more information!